<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">Delta Nu Alpha, Chapter 212, regular monthly meeting, March 27. Johnathan's restaurant, Hasbrouck He</div>

Delta Nu Alpha, Chapter 212, regular monthly meeting, March 27. Johnathan's restaurant, Hasbrouck He

<div>Delta Nu Alpha, Chapter 212, regular monthly meeting, March 27. Johnathan's restaurant, Hasbrouck Heights, N.J. Speaker is John Brady, manager transportation, Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. Contact: Anthony Branca, manager, import/export services, Preston Trucking Co. (201) 201-991-1800National Small Shipments Traffic Conference, annual spring meeting, March 28-30. Registry Hotel, Naples, Fla. Seminars on how to protect your job; intrastate and interstate regulation and deregulation, undercharge issues, credit rules and how to select carriers. Contact: Joseph F.H. Cutrona, Nasstrac's executive director. (202) 393-5505.Motor Fleet Supervisor Training, spring seminar on pupil transportation, March 28-30. Michigan State University, East Lansing, Mich....

Delta Nu Alpha, Chapter 212, regular monthly meeting, March 27. Johnathan's restaurant, Hasbrouck Heights, N.J. Speaker is John Brady, manager transportation, Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. Contact: Anthony Branca, manager, import/export services, Preston Trucking Co. (201) 201-991-1800 National Small Shipments Traffic Conference, annual spring meeting, March 28-30. Registry Hotel, Naples, Fla. Seminars on how to protect your job; intrastate and interstate regulation and deregulation, undercharge issues, credit rules and how to select carriers. Contact: Joseph F.H. Cutrona, Nasstrac's executive director. (202) 393-5505.Motor Fleet Supervisor Training, spring seminar on pupil transportation, March 28-30. Michigan State University, East Lansing, Mich. Contact: Donald L. Smith, executive director, NMFS. (517) 353-1790. Mountain-Plains Association of Rail Shippers, transportation seminar, March 29. Adam's Mark Hotel, Kansas City, Mo. Contact: M. Robert Turner, Gooch Milling & Elevator Co. (402) 477-4161. American Trucking Associations, intermodal council meeting on truck operators and draymen, March 30. Airport Hilton Hotel, New Orleans. Contact: John McQuaid, executive director, ATA Intermodal Council. (703) 838-1918. Transportation Research Forum, New York chapter, Apr. 4 Trade Inn, lower lever of World Trade Center. L. Stanley Crane, former head of Conrail is speaker. Contact: Paul Gessner, Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. (212) 432-4086. Traffic Club of Newark, computer trends in transportation, April 4. Town & Campus restaurant, Union, N.J. Contact: Susan Haverstick (201) 224-4600 or Greg Diefenbach (201) 918-9500. Council of Logistics Management, Houston roundtable, April 6. Dinner and tour of U.S. Coast Guard vessel traffic service port safety station at Galena Park, Texas. Contact: Larry Wiesman (713) 681-7505 or Tom Brockman (713) 584-1390. International Cargo Handling Coordination Assoc., U.S. national committee in cooperation with Port Authority of New York & New Jersey presents a two-day conference on changes in cargo transportation, April 6-7. World Trade Center, New York. Contact: Dorothy Rosciszewski, treasurer, ICHCA-USA. (212) 466-8317. Emergence of Domestic Containerization, sponsored by Intermodal Age International, April 5-7. Red Lion Hotel, Costa Mesa, Calif. Contact: Intermodal Age International. (312) 472-2729. Trucking Profitability Strategies: An Executive Forum, April 9-11. The University of Georgia. Athens, Ga. Contact:Susan K. (Kittsu) Swanson of University of Georgia at (404) 542-1964. Railroad Equipment Finance '89, annual conference, April 10-13. Queen Elizabeth Hotel, Montreal, Quebec. Contact: Diane Stromenger. (201) 893-1395. Tomorrow's Truck Symposium, co-sponsored by Engineering Society for Advanced Mobility Land Sea Air and Space and the maintenance council of American Trucking Associations, April 10-12. Westin Hotel, Detroit, Mich. Contact: SAE (412) 776-4841. Transportation Brokers Conference of America, annual convention, April 11-14. Omni Hotel, St. Louis. Contact: Liz Freyn, associate director, TBCA. (312) 480-1046. Council of Logistics Management and American Society of Transportation and Logistics, joint meeting of CLM's Westchester County/Lower Connecticut roundtable and ASTL's southern New England chapter, April 12. Manero's Restaurant, Greenwich, Conn. Contact: Bill Holdsworth (203) 356-3747 or George Yarusavage (203) 325-5248. American Trucking Associations, fundamentals of hazardous materials, April 12-14. Holiday Inn North, Indianapolis. Contact: ATA (703) 838-1755. Pacific Coast Association of Rail Shippers, bi-annual transportation seminar, April 13-14. Stardust Hotel and Country Club, San Diego, Calif. Contact: Al Bell, manager, business development, Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway. (213) 267-5166. Delta Nu Alpha Transportation Fraternity, central region 4 and chapter 328, April 17. Sterling Inn, Sterling Heights, Ill. Contact: John Horiszny, Texas Instruments Inc. (313) 553-1534 or Joyce Lang, Stroh Brewery Co. (313) 446-2493. American Society of Transportation and Logistics, briefing and round table on up-to-date logistics and component management, April 20-21. Hyatt O'Hare Hotel, Hartford, Conn. Contact: Carter M. Harrison, executive director, ASTL. (502) 451-8150.

Rail News

TRANSPORT CALENDAR

<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">Truckload carriers told the Wells Fargo industrial conference their market is tightening slowly, but enforcement of cabotage and language rules may speed the process. </div>

Truckload carriers told the Wells Fargo industrial conference their market is tightening slowly, but enforcement of cabotage and language rules may speed the process.

Feature image

<div class="phx-topic">Trucking executives are increasingly confident the freight market is approaching “equilibrium,” not due to higher demand but because they believe capacity is about to be cut faster by multiple factors, including tougher enforcement of US regulations. They’re looking for a lift — any lift — further off the bottom of a trucking downturn that has lasted three years, speakers told the 2025 Wells Fargo Industrials &amp; Materials Conference in Chicago this week. ”I think that there’s fragileness in supply chains and the supply side and any little lift will start to be felt,” said Bradley W. Hicks, president of dedicated contract services at J.B. Hunt Transport Service, according to a transcript. ”I think we’ll get back to net growth in the second half,” said Nicholas Hobbs, J.B. Hunt’s COO and president of highway and final-mile services. ”I can’t guarantee it’s by the end of Q3 or if it’s in Q4, there’s timing that comes in,” Hobbs said. In terms of dedicated contracts, “we can sell a deal even today, and we might not start that location until November or December,” he said. Despite a soft economy, manufacturing contraction and the impact of US tariffs on China and Mexico, the truckload market is not that bad, if not yet “completely normal,” said Mark Rourke, CEO and president of Schneider National, according to a transcript. ”The worst-case scenarios that were being bandied about haven’t played out,” he said. ”We can certainly see a downturn in the West Coast volumes that we would normally see at this juncture,” Rourke said. “But there’s also a lot of bonded warehouse activity still starting to come inland.” Some of the slack in West Coast truckload volume has been taken up by volumes in the Midwest and Southwest and cross-border volumes to and from Mexico, he said, adding that, “domestic demand has been fairly steady, if unspectacular.” Although Rourke, Hicks and Hobbs believe truck capacity is tightening, shippers have told the Journal of Commerce they haven’t seen any tightness yet, noting they have no trouble finding a truck. <h3>ELP, cabotage enforcement </h3>But the trucking executives see new factors emerging beyond low rates and higher insurance premiums that could remove more capacity. In particular, they cite federal enforcement of the English-language requirement for interstate drivers and a potential crackdown on cabotage by foreign drivers operating in the US under B-1 visas. “It is a matter of how consistent and broad-based the enforcement is,” Rourke said. Under new guidelines from the US Department of Transportation (DOT) that take effect June 25, an inability to communicate in English with officials or read road signs will automatically lead to drivers being placed out of service. An inability to communicate through English has been a violation but not an out-of-service violation since 2016. In 2024, state police and federal inspectors handed out 9,510 ELP violations out of 1.06 million total driver violations. Six drivers were placed out of service in 2024 for their inability to read or speak English sufficiently, according to Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) data. The impact of the strict enforcement of the ELP rule has been “a little bit dismissed too much and particularly in certain geographies where that could have more concentration and [be more of an] issue than others,” Rourke said. The second issue is cabotage, in which foreign drivers illegally haul domestic loads in the US. “There's a lot of noise really in the industry starting to spark about cabotage,” said Hobbs. “I think that's a really big play on where cheap rates are coming from.” Documented data supporting that belief is hard to find, however. Even so, “just a mere threatening of enforcement drives change,” said Rourke. Contact William B. Cassidy at <a href="mailto:bill.cassidy@spglobal.com">bill.cassidy@spglobal.com</a>. </div>

Trucking executives are increasingly confident the freight market is approaching “equilibrium,” not due to higher demand but because they believe capacity is about to be cut faster by multiple factors, including tougher enforcement of US regulations. They’re looking for a lift — any lift — further off the bottom of a trucking downturn that has lasted three years, speakers told the 2025 Wells Fargo Industrials & Materials Conference in Chicago this week. ”I think that there’s fragileness in supply chains and the supply side and any little lift will start to be felt,” said Bradley W. Hicks, president of dedicated contract services at J.B. Hunt Transport Service, according to a transcript. ”I think we’ll get back to net growth in the second half,” said Nicholas Hobbs, J.B. Hunt’s COO and president of highway and final-mile services. ”I can’t guarantee it’s by the end of Q3 or if it’s in Q4, there’s timing that comes in,” Hobbs said. In terms of dedicated contracts, “we can sell a deal even today, and we might not start that location until November or December,” he said. Despite a soft economy, manufacturing contraction and the impact of US tariffs on China and Mexico, the truckload market is not that bad, if not yet “completely normal,” said Mark Rourke, CEO and president of Schneider National, according to a transcript. ”The worst-case scenarios that were being bandied about haven’t played out,” he said. ”We can certainly see a downturn in the West Coast volumes that we would normally see at this juncture,” Rourke said. “But there’s also a lot of bonded warehouse activity still starting to come inland.” Some of the slack in West Coast truckload volume has been taken up by volumes in the Midwest and Southwest and cross-border volumes to and from Mexico, he said, adding that, “domestic demand has been fairly steady, if unspectacular.” Although Rourke, Hicks and Hobbs believe truck capacity is tightening, shippers have told the Journal of Commerce they haven’t seen any tightness yet, noting they have no trouble finding a truck. ELP, cabotage enforcement But the trucking executives see new factors emerging beyond low rates and higher insurance premiums that could remove more capacity. In particular, they cite federal enforcement of the English-language requirement for interstate drivers and a potential crackdown on cabotage by foreign drivers operating in the US under B-1 visas. “It is a matter of how consistent and broad-based the enforcement is,” Rourke said. Under new guidelines from the US Department of Transportation (DOT) that take effect June 25, an inability to communicate in English with officials or read road signs will automatically lead to drivers being placed out of service. An inability to communicate through English has been a violation but not an out-of-service violation since 2016. In 2024, state police and federal inspectors handed out 9,510 ELP violations out of 1.06 million total driver violations. Six drivers were placed out of service in 2024 for their inability to read or speak English sufficiently, according to Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) data. The impact of the strict enforcement of the ELP rule has been “a little bit dismissed too much and particularly in certain geographies where that could have more concentration and [be more of an] issue than others,” Rourke said. The second issue is cabotage, in which foreign drivers illegally haul domestic loads in the US. “There's a lot of noise really in the industry starting to spark about cabotage,” said Hobbs. “I think that's a really big play on where cheap rates are coming from.” Documented data supporting that belief is hard to find, however. Even so, “just a mere threatening of enforcement drives change,” said Rourke. Contact William B. Cassidy at bill.cassidy@spglobal.com .

Surface

Trucking News

Schneider, J.B. Hunt see US truck capacity shrinking in H2

<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">While some markets grapple with the lingering effects of trade disputes and fluctuating demand, others are experiencing unprecedented growth driven by green initiatives, robust domestic infrastructure development and the necessities of defense. </div>

While some markets grapple with the lingering effects of trade disputes and fluctuating demand, others are experiencing unprecedented growth driven by green initiatives, robust domestic infrastructure development and the necessities of defense.

<div class="phx-topic">From stalled steel mills in Sweden to booming infrastructure in India and an unexpected surge in defense logistics across Europe, project cargo specialists are adapting to a new industrial demand world order. Regional variations and emerging trends are shaping the movement of vital industrial components. While some markets grapple with the lingering effects of trade disputes and fluctuating demand, others are experiencing unprecedented growth driven by green initiatives, robust domestic infrastructure development and the necessities of defense. In Sweden, a comparatively small but heavily industrialized market, the impact of international trade policies resonates deeply. Speaking to the Journal of Commerce, Jonas Landhage, global project manager/team leader at freight forwarder Begoma, said that his home country “follows the bigger markets,” leaving it susceptible to global shifts, particularly US tariffs. “Since the tariffs from the US, everything is more or less on hold, both incoming and outgoing cargo,” he said. That uncertainty has stalled significant domestic projects, including large industrial steel mills that are waiting for a clearer trade outlook. “It’s a confusing time for everyone, and it makes everyone be a little bit afraid to do project cargo moves,” Landhage said. Finland, Sweden’s neighbor, presents a dual market scenario, according to Marianne Blechingberg, managing director of project cargo at forwarder Hacklin Oy. Blechingberg highlighted the green transition as a significant driver of project cargo in Finland. “Green transition companies are growing and growing, and they have a lot of cargo to ship,” she said. Conversely, traditional heavy industries in Finland face a different reality. After a 10-year boom, those traditional industries have reached saturation, which has led to significant adjustments. “Now all of a sudden, this market is full, and orders have diminished drastically,” Blechingberg said. <h3>Concerns for current projects </h3>In Spain, Franco Ribechini, project director at Barcelona-based forwarder Del Corona &amp; Scardigli Spain (DCS Group), acknowledged that project moves are still happening, yet expressed concern for future projects amid geopolitical tensions. “Companies that are already performing projects have seen their budgets increase a lot,” he told the Journal of Commerce, adding those shippers are moving project cargo “as soon as possible” under the shadow of strained international relations. If existing tensions between Spain and the US, mainly over foreign policy disagreements, do not ease, shippers already committed to projects will have no option but to accept a large increase in their budget, Ribechini warned. More positively, energy production is identified by Ribechini as a resilient sector. “Energy production — whether related to green energy or not — is still needed, especially in West and South African countries, and South America,” he said. “Here, shippers are bidding for projects, and those projects are developing very quickly.” India, meanwhile, has not taken its foot of the gas with industrial projects. Nilesh Sinha, director at New Delhi-based project cargo forwarder Procam, described the country’s project outlook as “very, very positive.” Sinha broke down the Indian market into two key drivers: internal infrastructure requirements and meeting global project demand. He sees current global challenges as an opportunity for India to fill gaps, highlighting the country’s focus on energy efficiency and carbon emissions. “India and China are the two countries who contribute the maximum to carbon emissions, so there is an opportunity there,” Sinha said. Meanwhile, an unexpected but growing project cargo segment has also emerged in Europe: the defense industry. Blechingberg highlighted its critical importance for Europe, especially due to the war in Ukraine. “This is creating opportunity for freight forwarders,” she said. Contact Carly Fields at <a href="mailto:carly.fields@spglobal.com">carly.fields@spglobal.com</a>. </div>

From stalled steel mills in Sweden to booming infrastructure in India and an unexpected surge in defense logistics across Europe, project cargo specialists are adapting to a new industrial demand world order. Regional variations and emerging trends are shaping the movement of vital industrial components. While some markets grapple with the lingering effects of trade disputes and fluctuating demand, others are experiencing unprecedented growth driven by green initiatives, robust domestic infrastructure development and the necessities of defense. In Sweden, a comparatively small but heavily industrialized market, the impact of international trade policies resonates deeply. Speaking to the Journal of Commerce, Jonas Landhage, global project manager/team leader at freight forwarder Begoma, said that his home country “follows the bigger markets,” leaving it susceptible to global shifts, particularly US tariffs. “Since the tariffs from the US, everything is more or less on hold, both incoming and outgoing cargo,” he said. That uncertainty has stalled significant domestic projects, including large industrial steel mills that are waiting for a clearer trade outlook. “It’s a confusing time for everyone, and it makes everyone be a little bit afraid to do project cargo moves,” Landhage said. Finland, Sweden’s neighbor, presents a dual market scenario, according to Marianne Blechingberg, managing director of project cargo at forwarder Hacklin Oy. Blechingberg highlighted the green transition as a significant driver of project cargo in Finland. “Green transition companies are growing and growing, and they have a lot of cargo to ship,” she said. Conversely, traditional heavy industries in Finland face a different reality. After a 10-year boom, those traditional industries have reached saturation, which has led to significant adjustments. “Now all of a sudden, this market is full, and orders have diminished drastically,” Blechingberg said. Concerns for current projects In Spain, Franco Ribechini, project director at Barcelona-based forwarder Del Corona & Scardigli Spain (DCS Group), acknowledged that project moves are still happening, yet expressed concern for future projects amid geopolitical tensions. “Companies that are already performing projects have seen their budgets increase a lot,” he told the Journal of Commerce, adding those shippers are moving project cargo “as soon as possible” under the shadow of strained international relations. If existing tensions between Spain and the US, mainly over foreign policy disagreements, do not ease, shippers already committed to projects will have no option but to accept a large increase in their budget, Ribechini warned. More positively, energy production is identified by Ribechini as a resilient sector. “Energy production — whether related to green energy or not — is still needed, especially in West and South African countries, and South America,” he said. “Here, shippers are bidding for projects, and those projects are developing very quickly.” India, meanwhile, has not taken its foot of the gas with industrial projects. Nilesh Sinha, director at New Delhi-based project cargo forwarder Procam, described the country’s project outlook as “very, very positive.” Sinha broke down the Indian market into two key drivers: internal infrastructure requirements and meeting global project demand. He sees current global challenges as an opportunity for India to fill gaps, highlighting the country’s focus on energy efficiency and carbon emissions. “India and China are the two countries who contribute the maximum to carbon emissions, so there is an opportunity there,” Sinha said. Meanwhile, an unexpected but growing project cargo segment has also emerged in Europe: the defense industry. Blechingberg highlighted its critical importance for Europe, especially due to the war in Ukraine. “This is creating opportunity for freight forwarders,” she said. Contact Carly Fields at carly.fields@spglobal.com .

Maritime

Breakbulk News

Project cargo

Industrial cargo demand challenged by regional variation, economic uncertainty

<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">The intermodal yard and attached warehouse park would be developed about 50 miles outside the city and are part of a $170 million investment plan unveiled by the railroad. </div>

The intermodal yard and attached warehouse park would be developed about 50 miles outside the city and are part of a $170 million investment plan unveiled by the railroad.

<div class="phx-topic">Canadian National (CN) said Wednesday it plans to invest $170 million in its Illinois rail operations, including the development of a long-planned logistics park outside of Chicago. CN said that along with track maintenance and other infrastructure projects in the state, the investment will go toward the construction of the “Chicago Logistics Hub,” a 900-acre development site about 50 miles outside Chicago. The site, located in the village of Channahon, will include an intermodal yard and a business park for warehouses, CN said in a statement. The railroad acquired the site when it bought the Elgin, Joliet and Eastern Railway in 2009. CN has previously said that acquiring rail trackage outside of the metropolitan Chicago region provides an advantage in transit times of up to 48 hours relative to other Class I railroads. “Our continued infrastructure investment in Illinois will help strengthen the resiliency and efficiency of our network across the state,” CN Chief Executive Tracy Robinson said in the statement. Earlier this year, CN completed a project to extend siding track for four miles in the Chicago area to improve fluidity and railcar capacity in the region. The $54 million siding project was part of CN’s 2024 capital budget in the state, including $15 million for containers and yard equipment and $10 million for its other intermodal hubs. CN is expected to break ground on the new hub this year, according to the village of Channahon, with the project scheduled to be completed in late 2027 or early 2028. Contact Michael Angell at <a href="mailto:michael.angell@spglobal.com">michael.angell@spglobal.com</a>. </div>

Canadian National (CN) said Wednesday it plans to invest $170 million in its Illinois rail operations, including the development of a long-planned logistics park outside of Chicago. CN said that along with track maintenance and other infrastructure projects in the state, the investment will go toward the construction of the “Chicago Logistics Hub,” a 900-acre development site about 50 miles outside Chicago. The site, located in the village of Channahon, will include an intermodal yard and a business park for warehouses, CN said in a statement. The railroad acquired the site when it bought the Elgin, Joliet and Eastern Railway in 2009. CN has previously said that acquiring rail trackage outside of the metropolitan Chicago region provides an advantage in transit times of up to 48 hours relative to other Class I railroads. “Our continued infrastructure investment in Illinois will help strengthen the resiliency and efficiency of our network across the state,” CN Chief Executive Tracy Robinson said in the statement. Earlier this year, CN completed a project to extend siding track for four miles in the Chicago area to improve fluidity and railcar capacity in the region. The $54 million siding project was part of CN’s 2024 capital budget in the state, including $15 million for containers and yard equipment and $10 million for its other intermodal hubs. CN is expected to break ground on the new hub this year, according to the village of Channahon, with the project scheduled to be completed in late 2027 or early 2028. Contact Michael Angell at michael.angell@spglobal.com .

Intermodal providers

Canadian National to move forward on new Chicago-area logistics hub

<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">ACP Administrator Ricaurte Vásquez Morales says developing the terminal would help ease the concerns of ocean carriers that the canal’s existing container terminals are concentrated among a handful of operators. </div>

ACP Administrator Ricaurte Vásquez Morales says developing the terminal would help ease the concerns of ocean carriers that the canal’s existing container terminals are concentrated among a handful of operators.

<div class="phx-topic">The Panama Canal Authority (ACP) could build and operate a long-stalled container terminal as part of a wider logistics hub development near Panama City on the Atlantic Ocean side of the canal, the authority’s top executive says. ACP Administrator Ricaurte Vásquez Morales told the Journal of Commerce the move would help allay ocean carrier concerns that the canal’s existing container terminals are concentrated among a handful of operators, thus affecting the canal’s neutrality and competitiveness. ACP intends that the 5 million-TEU Corozal Container Terminal should be a common-user facility, open to all container lines. “We are studying the possibility of reactivating a project where the Panama Canal Authority would develop a logistics hub, which would include various terminals, within the canal area that safeguards neutrality for the canal and all of the shipping companies navigating the waterway,” Vásquez said. That comes as worries about market dominance have emerged since Hong Kong conglomerate CK Hutchison <a href="https://www.joc.com/article/hutchison-inks-228-billion-deal-to-sell-majority-of-port-holdings-to-blackrock-til-5955819">agreed to a $23 billion preliminary deal in March</a> to sell its global port interests outside China to a consortium of BlackRock and Terminal Investment Limited (TiL). TiL is the terminals division of Mediterranean Shipping Co. and already has a presence in Panama’s terminals sector through its partnership with investment company Notarc Management Group (NMG) to develop the $1.4 billion Panama Colon Container Port (PCCP). TiL/NMG took over the project in 2022 after the Panama Maritime Authority canceled an earlier agreement with a Chinese consortium led by Hong Kong/China shipping and port group Landbridge for alleged non-compliance. “To be clear, the concessions made to port operators, including that of Panama Ports Company owned by Hutchinson, lie fully in the hands of the Panamanian government and are not within the purview of the Panama Canal Authority,” Vasquez said. “However, we are aware of the concerns surrounding a capacity concentration that our shipping clients anticipate with the current proposal on the table.” Details of the logistics hub, including the container terminals, will be given at an ACP briefing on June 19. <h3>Political intrigue </h3>The ACP selected four terminal operators in 2016 to bid for a concession to build and operate the Corozal terminal. The project has been in abeyance since 2017 after none of the four, which included APM Terminals, Singapore’s PSA International and CMA CGM’s Terminal Line, submitted a bid, according to then-ACP administrator Jorge Quijano. Neither TiL nor NMG responded to requests for comment this week from the Journal of Commerce. MSC, already the world’s biggest container line in terms of capacity, will also emerge as the largest global terminal operator with throughput volumes of almost 120 million TEUs based on 2023 figures, according to estimates from maritime consultancy Drewry. Hutchison has confirmed that TiL is the lead partner in the planned acquisition. The BlackRock-TiL deal comprises two agreements. The first covers the sale of Panama Ports Company (PPC), in which Hutchison has a 90% stake and operates Balboa and Christobal container terminals at either end of the canal; the second comprises Hutchison’s 80% stake in Hutchison Port Holdings, which controls its non-China terminals. Together, these cover a total of 43 ports with 199 berths in 23 countries. But the deal, particularly the sale of the Panama ports, is caught <a href="https://www.joc.com/article/beijing-issues-warning-over-hutchisons-proposed-sale-of-panama-ports-company-5962910">in the crosshairs of a geopolitical wrangle between the US and China</a>. Semi-official commentators in China have voiced opposition to the sale on the grounds of China’s national and security interests, while China’s anti-trust regulator is probing the sale partly on national security grounds. At the same time, the Trump administration has vowed to take back control of the canal to curb what it says is China’s control of cargo through the waterway. Panama legal officials are also probing the way Panama Ports Company secured an extension to its 25-year concession to operate the Balboa and Christobal terminals in 2021 for possible irregularities. The Panama government and PPC have denied any wrongdoing. There are currently five operators with terminals along the canal. Aside from Hutchison’s PPC, other firms with facilities are Taiwan’s Evergreen Marine, which operates Colon Container Terminal; PSA International, which controls the PSA Panama International Terminal at Rodman; SSA Marine, which operates the Manzanillo International Terminal at Colon; and TiL/NMG with the PCCP. Contact Keith Wallis at <a href="mailto:keithwallis@hotmail.com">keithwallis@hotmail.com</a>. </div>

The Panama Canal Authority (ACP) could build and operate a long-stalled container terminal as part of a wider logistics hub development near Panama City on the Atlantic Ocean side of the canal, the authority’s top executive says. ACP Administrator Ricaurte Vásquez Morales told the Journal of Commerce the move would help allay ocean carrier concerns that the canal’s existing container terminals are concentrated among a handful of operators, thus affecting the canal’s neutrality and competitiveness. ACP intends that the 5 million-TEU Corozal Container Terminal should be a common-user facility, open to all container lines. “We are studying the possibility of reactivating a project where the Panama Canal Authority would develop a logistics hub, which would include various terminals, within the canal area that safeguards neutrality for the canal and all of the shipping companies navigating the waterway,” Vásquez said. That comes as worries about market dominance have emerged since Hong Kong conglomerate CK Hutchison agreed to a $23 billion preliminary deal in March to sell its global port interests outside China to a consortium of BlackRock and Terminal Investment Limited (TiL). TiL is the terminals division of Mediterranean Shipping Co. and already has a presence in Panama’s terminals sector through its partnership with investment company Notarc Management Group (NMG) to develop the $1.4 billion Panama Colon Container Port (PCCP). TiL/NMG took over the project in 2022 after the Panama Maritime Authority canceled an earlier agreement with a Chinese consortium led by Hong Kong/China shipping and port group Landbridge for alleged non-compliance. “To be clear, the concessions made to port operators, including that of Panama Ports Company owned by Hutchinson, lie fully in the hands of the Panamanian government and are not within the purview of the Panama Canal Authority,” Vasquez said. “However, we are aware of the concerns surrounding a capacity concentration that our shipping clients anticipate with the current proposal on the table.” Details of the logistics hub, including the container terminals, will be given at an ACP briefing on June 19. Political intrigue The ACP selected four terminal operators in 2016 to bid for a concession to build and operate the Corozal terminal. The project has been in abeyance since 2017 after none of the four, which included APM Terminals, Singapore’s PSA International and CMA CGM’s Terminal Line, submitted a bid, according to then-ACP administrator Jorge Quijano. Neither TiL nor NMG responded to requests for comment this week from the Journal of Commerce. MSC, already the world’s biggest container line in terms of capacity, will also emerge as the largest global terminal operator with throughput volumes of almost 120 million TEUs based on 2023 figures, according to estimates from maritime consultancy Drewry. Hutchison has confirmed that TiL is the lead partner in the planned acquisition. The BlackRock-TiL deal comprises two agreements. The first covers the sale of Panama Ports Company (PPC), in which Hutchison has a 90% stake and operates Balboa and Christobal container terminals at either end of the canal; the second comprises Hutchison’s 80% stake in Hutchison Port Holdings, which controls its non-China terminals. Together, these cover a total of 43 ports with 199 berths in 23 countries. But the deal, particularly the sale of the Panama ports, is caught in the crosshairs of a geopolitical wrangle between the US and China . Semi-official commentators in China have voiced opposition to the sale on the grounds of China’s national and security interests, while China’s anti-trust regulator is probing the sale partly on national security grounds. At the same time, the Trump administration has vowed to take back control of the canal to curb what it says is China’s control of cargo through the waterway. Panama legal officials are also probing the way Panama Ports Company secured an extension to its 25-year concession to operate the Balboa and Christobal terminals in 2021 for possible irregularities. The Panama government and PPC have denied any wrongdoing. There are currently five operators with terminals along the canal. Aside from Hutchison’s PPC, other firms with facilities are Taiwan’s Evergreen Marine, which operates Colon Container Terminal; PSA International, which controls the PSA Panama International Terminal at Rodman; SSA Marine, which operates the Manzanillo International Terminal at Colon; and TiL/NMG with the PCCP. Contact Keith Wallis at keithwallis@hotmail.com .

Port News

Port infrastructure

International ports

Panama Canal mulls developing Corozal to allay neutrality fears over Hutchison deal

<div class="phx-topic abstract-wrapper">Liners have enjoyed the higher rates and profits that come from external market shocks, but it’s fair to wonder how sustainable that is, writes Peter Tirschwell.</div>

Liners have enjoyed the higher rates and profits that come from external market shocks, but it’s fair to wonder how sustainable that is, writes Peter Tirschwell.

<div class="phx-topic">It’s become a pattern that most ocean carriers are privately all too happy to accept, even at the expense of frustrated customers. The pattern is this: External shocks wreak havoc, system-wide capacity is effectively withdrawn due to port congestion, longer transits or re-deployed tonnage, and rates and profits go up. <div class="wrapper-narrow float-right-element"><img src="/images/phoenix/6023285_0.1.jpg"></img></div>For carriers that had struggled for decades, these recent problems — beginning with the COVID-19 pandemic and continuing with the Red Sea, Panama Canal, tariffs and growing global port congestion — are good problems to have. But how long can it last? And what happens when the party’s over? The private view of carriers – that customers contributed to their years in financial purgatory – makes them minimally sympathetic to the impact, and increasingly willing to do their part to hit the brakes on capacity. Carriers went from having virtually no ability 25 years ago to pull capacity to embracing slow steaming, idling, blank sailings, and in the case of some carriers, buying versus chartering and thus controlling tonnage. Carriers “do not want to change the practices of [port] omissions, slow steaming, cut-and-runs, demurrage and detention,” said one knowledgeable observer of carriers. “They like disruptions and are not eager to move to a model where cargo is delivered as booked.” Years such as 2024 and now 2025, which were supposed to be awash in red ink for carriers, suddenly became profitable. But carriers must wonder how sustainable the “disruptive” model is. <h3>Carriers may soon need to be competitive </h3>The weakness is obvious. The pandemic could well have been a fluke, a once-in-a-century catastrophe; the Red Sea could reopen at any time and the US and China are taking steps toward a trade truce. Port congestion and its impact on end-to-end capacity could ease as global growth, including trade growth, slows due to US tariffs. And all the while overcapacity looms thanks to a massive ordering spree during and since the pandemic. JP Morgan noted last month that “industry dynamics remain unfavorable given structural oversupply, despite near-term disruption boosting short-term rates.” Thus, carriers could soon be facing a market where they will need to be competitive. Price is a given as rates will find a level commensurate with supply and demand. But what about service? In a purely commoditized market, rates alone are enough to attract cargo. But what if there is meaningful differentiation in schedule reliability beyond the few niche carriers such as Matson, UWL/Swire and Tailwind whose franchise is based on reliability? Regional Asian carriers serving mostly a forwarder market tell us they feel no pressure to improve schedule reliability, other than to avoid embarrassment when reliability rankings are published. Other carriers have long been only somewhat concerned about reliability, understanding that shippers are diverse, with a great many prioritizing price over transit time, and options are few as carriers consolidate. <h3>Gemini as a model </h3>But not all think this way. Maersk and Hapag-Lloyd in their Gemini Cooperation alliance have tacked away from the fleet with an offering that, instead of relying on disruption for profits, aligns their interests with that of customers. If it works, it won’t simply be price, trade lane presence or longstanding partnerships that determine where shippers direct their cargo. It will be results. That point is being made more loudly following the initial success of the hub-and-spoke-based Gemini in hitting its 90% reliability goal; it was 90.7% in March and April, including both origin and destination arrivals, according to Sea-Intelligence Maritime Analysis. “The effect of Gemini is really interesting,” industry veteran Per Starup Sennicksen wrote recently on LinkedIn. “Many old timers, who condemned the hub-and-spoke network model, will have to change their opinions.” Is the wider industry taking notice? With Gemini still young, it is premature to say whether it’s influencing other carriers. But carriers plowing investment into terminals on a global basis show the need for greater end-to-end control; that is the lynchpin of Gemini that is based on Maersk and Hapag-Lloyd’s control of hub ports. “I can’t say we’ve seen any real effort from competing alliances and carriers to up their game, from a purely operational angle,” said Simon Sundboell, CEO of eeSea, which monitors carrier schedule reliability. “The delays are still significant, and the last-minute changes and volatility are observable to anyone.” However, he added: “What I can confirm, though, is that we’ve had real interest in understanding the reliability methodology and numbers from several of the major carriers in just the past two months, as well as from cargo owners and logistics providers. So it’s on the radar out there.” Maersk is wasting no time in showing how its service is differentiated. “We are now sitting at a reliability level that we haven’t been able to see as an industry for a very long time,” Maersk North America President Charles van der Steen told the Journal of Commerce in late May. “There is a dynamic where we can see the opportunity in the not-too-distant future to start thinking about leveraging ocean freight to the benefit of our broader supply chain, taking inventory out, reducing cycle times, et cetera.” Could it be that out of the chaos of the past five years, real value will emerge? Contact Peter Tirschwell at <a href="mailto:peter.tirschwell@spglobal.com">peter.tirschwell@spglobal.com</a>. </div>

It’s become a pattern that most ocean carriers are privately all too happy to accept, even at the expense of frustrated customers. The pattern is this: External shocks wreak havoc, system-wide capacity is effectively withdrawn due to port congestion, longer transits or re-deployed tonnage, and rates and profits go up. For carriers that had struggled for decades, these recent problems — beginning with the COVID-19 pandemic and continuing with the Red Sea, Panama Canal, tariffs and growing global port congestion — are good problems to have. But how long can it last? And what happens when the party’s over? The private view of carriers – that customers contributed to their years in financial purgatory – makes them minimally sympathetic to the impact, and increasingly willing to do their part to hit the brakes on capacity. Carriers went from having virtually no ability 25 years ago to pull capacity to embracing slow steaming, idling, blank sailings, and in the case of some carriers, buying versus chartering and thus controlling tonnage. Carriers “do not want to change the practices of [port] omissions, slow steaming, cut-and-runs, demurrage and detention,” said one knowledgeable observer of carriers. “They like disruptions and are not eager to move to a model where cargo is delivered as booked.” Years such as 2024 and now 2025, which were supposed to be awash in red ink for carriers, suddenly became profitable. But carriers must wonder how sustainable the “disruptive” model is. Carriers may soon need to be competitive The weakness is obvious. The pandemic could well have been a fluke, a once-in-a-century catastrophe; the Red Sea could reopen at any time and the US and China are taking steps toward a trade truce. Port congestion and its impact on end-to-end capacity could ease as global growth, including trade growth, slows due to US tariffs. And all the while overcapacity looms thanks to a massive ordering spree during and since the pandemic. JP Morgan noted last month that “industry dynamics remain unfavorable given structural oversupply, despite near-term disruption boosting short-term rates.” Thus, carriers could soon be facing a market where they will need to be competitive. Price is a given as rates will find a level commensurate with supply and demand. But what about service? In a purely commoditized market, rates alone are enough to attract cargo. But what if there is meaningful differentiation in schedule reliability beyond the few niche carriers such as Matson, UWL/Swire and Tailwind whose franchise is based on reliability? Regional Asian carriers serving mostly a forwarder market tell us they feel no pressure to improve schedule reliability, other than to avoid embarrassment when reliability rankings are published. Other carriers have long been only somewhat concerned about reliability, understanding that shippers are diverse, with a great many prioritizing price over transit time, and options are few as carriers consolidate. Gemini as a model But not all think this way. Maersk and Hapag-Lloyd in their Gemini Cooperation alliance have tacked away from the fleet with an offering that, instead of relying on disruption for profits, aligns their interests with that of customers. If it works, it won’t simply be price, trade lane presence or longstanding partnerships that determine where shippers direct their cargo. It will be results. That point is being made more loudly following the initial success of the hub-and-spoke-based Gemini in hitting its 90% reliability goal; it was 90.7% in March and April, including both origin and destination arrivals, according to Sea-Intelligence Maritime Analysis. “The effect of Gemini is really interesting,” industry veteran Per Starup Sennicksen wrote recently on LinkedIn. “Many old timers, who condemned the hub-and-spoke network model, will have to change their opinions.” Is the wider industry taking notice? With Gemini still young, it is premature to say whether it’s influencing other carriers. But carriers plowing investment into terminals on a global basis show the need for greater end-to-end control; that is the lynchpin of Gemini that is based on Maersk and Hapag-Lloyd’s control of hub ports. “I can’t say we’ve seen any real effort from competing alliances and carriers to up their game, from a purely operational angle,” said Simon Sundboell, CEO of eeSea, which monitors carrier schedule reliability. “The delays are still significant, and the last-minute changes and volatility are observable to anyone.” However, he added: “What I can confirm, though, is that we’ve had real interest in understanding the reliability methodology and numbers from several of the major carriers in just the past two months, as well as from cargo owners and logistics providers. So it’s on the radar out there.” Maersk is wasting no time in showing how its service is differentiated. “We are now sitting at a reliability level that we haven’t been able to see as an industry for a very long time,” Maersk North America President Charles van der Steen told the Journal of Commerce in late May. “There is a dynamic where we can see the opportunity in the not-too-distant future to start thinking about leveraging ocean freight to the benefit of our broader supply chain, taking inventory out, reducing cycle times, et cetera.” Could it be that out of the chaos of the past five years, real value will emerge? Contact Peter Tirschwell at peter.tirschwell@spglobal.com .

Container lines

Carriers ride wave of ‘disruptive’ operating model, but for how long?

Use code GTW695 at checkout and save $800 on first year of an annual Gold subscription!

Upgrade Subscription - Gold Trials

Become a Gold Subscriber and Save!

Use code TPMGW595 at checkout to save $900 on first year of a Gold subscription and 20% on TPM26!

Upgrade Subscription - Wide Box

UPGRADE TO GOLD AND SAVE ON TPM26

Arm your team with the most trusted information portal for the international container shipping industry.

Group Subscriptions - Wide Box

Get into a group subscription today

Access Journal of Commerce content for 30 days

Free Trial - Wide Box

START A FREE TRIAL TODAY

Use code STSW20 at checkout to save 20% on the first year of any annual subscription! 

Subscribe Now - Free Trials - Wide Box

SUBSCRIBE AND SAVE

Choose a subscription plan that works best for you!

Subscribe Now - Anonymous - Wide Box

SUBSCRIBE TODAY

The world of LTL is slow to embrace change. Business anachronisms permeate current supply chain processes. These vestiges of the way things used to work define the LTL freight transportation procurement process of many modern shippers.David Knuth, logistics specialist at IEWC, a global supplier of cable and wire based in Wisconsin, is happy to have modernized the RFP process, automating the entire LTL bidding procedure with Bid$ense, SMC³’s automated truckload and LTL freight transportation sourcing solution. But when prompted, he can still recall what once was.In his previous job, a large part of his duties were consumed by creating an intermodal bid package for carriers. In a spreadsheet, Knuth detailed the company’s volumes lane by lane, taking care to delete any errant keystrokes or misleading data. He would then email out the information to each carrier, taking time to respond to detailed technical questions about the spreadsheet data. Finally, he had to compile all the results, create an algorithm that would compare the carriers on each lane, and award the business.“It was a huge undertaking. It took about four months to do,” Knuth said of the old process. “It was almost a full-time job for that part of the year, every year.”In his new job at IEWC, he sat down with Bid$ense on day one and was amazed at the capabilities. Knuth had never before used a bid tool. SMC³’s latest versions of Bid$ense automate the process even further, taking truckload and LTL RFPs entirely online. The tool draws on RFP best-practices protocols to streamline the bidding communication process, enabling bidding carriers to respond accurately and promptly to shipper requests. The solution also does all the distribution work automatically, electronically submitting shipper bid data to carriers based on their actual service capabilities and performance records. Carriers are alerted with timely prompts for RFP deliverables, so shippers aren’t waiting by the phone for responses.Another benefit of automating the process is the data-cleansing assistance. When Knuth sent spreadsheets to carriers, data errors might cloud the bidding process; he might have to resend data or simply accept a price that did not truly reflect the costs of doing business. Data cleansing is incredibly beneficial, he said.The spreadsheet technique also made bidding analysis an onerous task. Since Bid$ense automates and streamlines the entire RFP process, intensive examination is now simple. SMC³ knows that each bid has more than one best outcome. With uniform responses from each carrier, shippers can quickly rank results and create an unlimited quantity of what-if scenarios to make the optimal procurement decision.Jesse Burnett of Central Garden &amp; Pet experiences many of the same benefits. Founded in 1980, Central Garden &amp; Pet has spent the last three decades growing from a small garden supply company to a provider of a range of products from dog chews and bird seed to soil supplements and natural insecticides. For much of its life, the company shipped these disparate goods via LTL and truckload carriers to retailers throughout the country, relying on each business unit to negotiate directly with their freight transportation providers. This arrangement worked fairly well for a small company, but as Central Garden &amp; Pet expanded, leadership decided to consolidate decision making.Burnett helped centralize the transportation decision making in 2015 with SMC³’s Bid$ense. Before Bid$ense, every business unit operated independently as far as negotiating with carriers.“There were a lot of different things just floating around,” he said. “We didn’t have master agreements in place; no national pricing at all. The pricing from carriers was just all over the place, depending on where you were.”The transformations he saw with Bid$ense were immediate. Burnett has been using the tool about every other year since its implementation at the company. Central Garden and Pet’s $19.6 million 2019 LTL bid saved the company just more than 9 percent when compared to its historical average. For Burnett, though, bid automation extends far beyond savings.“We knew that we weren’t getting the best pricing offer from our carriers just because nothing was centralized,” he continued. “We knew that if we combined everything from all these business units and paired it with one corporate offering, then it would drive some cost benefit with it.”When the company initially decided to centralize bid procurement, executives researched a number of different methodologies and technologies. In the end, though, Burnett found that Bid$ense was both widespread and well known, and that his carrier partners already knew how to use the application. Burnett also highlighted the data-cleansing process as a major benefit, saying the rigorous process ensures that carriers always return the best price.“It definitely has helped drive savings,” he said. “Any time you go out there and you drive that competitiveness with the carriers and they know they’re in a bid environment, it seems to sharpen their pencils.”Transportation procurement is an integral part of the modern supply chain. With Bid$ense, shippers can develop a strategic implementation plan that saves them time and money, but also helps them create strong relationships with their carrier partners. These carriers appreciate the solution’s data-cleansing process; when carriers receive a complete shipment history and future volume forecast, they don’t have to guess on pricing. Carriers that receive more data from shippers get a complete picture of that shipper’s freight, allowing them to accurately plan instead of simply preparing for the worst-case scenario. Clean data presented through an automated system can lead to both bigger shipment savings and a lasting partnership between carrier and customer.Whether customers are looking to streamline over-the-road transportation bidding by automating the RFP process or create an entirely new, centralized sourcing process, Bid$ense has the analytical horsepower to get the job done.SMC³ 2020 Customer Case Study

SMC3rates_shutterstock_5247046.jpg

Shippers save money, time with automated transportation bidding tools

If there’s one immutable truth in the world of logistics, it’s this: LTL is an inherently complex form of transportation. Tariffs, rates, DIM weights, transit times — it’s enough to confuse even seasoned logistics professionals. The solution to this knowledge gap has historically been on-the-job training or university supply chain education, but for a variety of reasons there is now a pressing need for third-party, remote LTL training that prepares logistics workers for transportation success. Global Scope Can Overlook Local Intricacies In the past, professionals looking to move into a supply chain career learned about the basics of supply chain from universities. However, many of these college supply chain programs are now global in scope, focusing on worldwide supply chain management instead of the intricacies of specialized domestic transportation. And even these programs, which used to be widespread, are becoming less common. LTL is not an industry of broad-brush strokes; supply chain professionals really need a pointillistic understanding of the logistics of LTL in order to excel in the industry. Accelerating Need for Dedicated LTL Education This lack of specified training put the onus on employers to prepare new hires with the LTL knowledge needed to do their jobs. Dedicated LTL study is a necessity, not a luxury. At the same time, changes in LTL and the broader supply chain world are accelerating. The reliance on e-commerce has ballooned since the start of the pandemic, and last-mile LTL shipments and related e-commerce strains on the supply chain won’t diminish once social distancing abates. That genie isn’t going back into the bottle. So supply chain employers need logistics workers that are fully versed in all aspects of the industry, ready to solve unique shipping and delivery problems based on their extensive supply chain knowledge But why care about LTL? It’s been reported that some shippers in today’s world are no longer concerned with what mode is used to ship their goods. A Multimodal Approach Ensures On-Time Delivery This mode agnosticism means supply chain stakeholders have to be well versed in all modes of transportation. As unforeseen weather events and other disruptions, such as protests, become more common, savvy logistics employees will need to be armed with familiarity of all modes, not just the most popular, to ensure that freight is delivered on time, without damage, and in the most financially expedient way possible. Offerings like SMC³’s LTL online education courses cover a wide range of topics from LTL basics and operations to more advanced concepts like pricing analytics and transportation law. The company also has plans to continually refresh content, adding new expert presenters and taking the feedback of students to make the courses even better as time goes on. Learn more about&nbsp;<a href="https://logisticstrainingcenter.com/smc3-courses/" rel="noreferrer" class="joc_admin__link">SMC³’s LTL Online Education program</a>&nbsp;and view the 2021 hybrid schedule, featuring live industry experts,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.smc3.com/onlinelearning2021/" rel="noreferrer" class="joc_admin__link">here.</a>

SMC3rates_shutterstock_5247046 (1).jpg

Filling the Supply Chain Education Gap with LTL Education Courses

UPGRADE TO GOLD AND SAVE: Use code GTW695 at checkout and save $800 on first year of a Gold subscription!

Upgrade Subscription

SUBSCRIBE AND SAVE: Use code STSW20 at checkout to save 20% on first year of any annual subscription!


Subscribe Now - Free Trials - Offer Box

GET INTO A GROUP SUBSCRIPTION: Arm your team with unlimited Journal of Commerce content

Group Subscriptions - Offer Box

Group Subscriptions

SUBSCRIBE TODAY: Choose a subscription plan that works best for you!

Subscribe Now - Anonymous - Offer Box

Subscribe Today

UPGRADE TO GOLD AND SAVE ON TPM26: Use code TPMGW595 at checkout to save $900 on first year of a Gold subscription and 20% on TPM26! 

Upgrade Subscription - Offer Box

START A FREE TRIAL: Access Journal of Commerce content for 30 days

Free Trial - Offer Box

Free Trial

Monthly publication providing an editorial deep dive into global supply chain news

Journal of Commerce Magazine - Rectangle Box

Journal of Commerce Magazine

An in-depth analysis of transport trends in the multipurpose and heavy-lift fleet segment

Breakbulk Report - Rectangle Box

Breakbulk Quarterly

Customers scoring their intermodal partners to identify the best service providers

Intermodal Service Scorecard - Rectangle Box

Intermodal Service Scorecard

A must-attend conference for shippers & logistics providers moving goods inland

Inland Conference - Rectangle Box

Attend Inland25

A premium access index of savings using domestic intermodal vs. OTR 

ISI Report - Rectangle Box

Intermodal Savings Index

An extensive dashboard of charts organized by trade lane, mode, and topic

Gateway - Rectangle Box

Gateway

A premium access outlook critical to shippers and transportation providers

QI Report - Rectangle Box

Quarterly Intelligence

The Journal of Commerce’s analysis and coverage of North American and global rail news encompasses Class I railroad, intermodal marketing providers, and supporting drayage and truckload services. Reporting on freight railroad news today, journalists track volume, intermodal freight rates, service levels, precision schedule railroading, transloading, regulation, union labor and network investment at domestic and international intermodal terminals.

North-American rail

International rail

Stay updated with our rail transport news and trends. Journal of Commerce covers intermodal news, and port connectivity news in the container rail transport sector.

Rail News | Journal of Commerce

The Journal of Commerce’s surface transport news and analysis focuses on landside transport movement — from railroad news to trucking news — including full load trucking, less-than-truckload (LTL), refrigerated (or reefer) trucking, flatbed and domestic and international intermodal rail, and how it connects with seaports, inland rail hubs, distribution centers and transloading operations. Reporting on the surface transport sector covers the movement of domestic shipments within the United States and international cargoes transported via domestic equipment including trailers and 53-foot containers.

Discover comprehensive trucking news and trends with Journal of Commerce - from trucking LTL to regulation and trucking supply and demand.

Trucking News | Journal of Commerce

Explore the world of ground transport news - from trucks to railroads, intermodal connections, and port ties. Daily insights on US and global shipments.

Latest News

Quarterly Intelligence

Filling the Supply Chain Education Gap with LTL Education Courses

More News & Analysis

Schneider, J.B. Hunt see US truck capacity shrinking in H2

Industrial cargo demand challenged by regional variation, economic uncertainty

Canadian National to move forward on new Chicago-area logistics hub